Capture commitments before they become project drift
Make the follow-up
defensible.
Paste the notes. Check what was decided, who owns what and what is still unclear. Every item keeps the line that supports it.
Workspace
What did the meeting actually leave behind?
The public version recognises clearly labelled decisions, actions and questions. It never tries to infer agreement from ordinary discussion.
Meeting notes
Helpful labels: Decision: Action: Question:.
Owners and dates stay blank when the notes do not provide them.
Your review will appear here.
Start with the safe example to see how each decision and action links back to the supplied notes.
Check every item
Approval applies only to this downloaded record. It does not approve the underlying project decision.
Approved record
Ready to follow up.
Control and evidence
Language can propose. Evidence and people control the record.
This page uses transparent browser rules so anyone can try the workflow without an account or model key. For less structured notes, the repository contains a tested LangGraph path that must pause for named human review.
Inspect the graph and tests ↗- CodeHashes the source and creates stable evidence blocks.
- Bounded modelCan propose structured items, but has no tools or approval authority.
- CodeRejects any item whose quote does not match the source.
- LangGraphStops and waits for a named human reviewer.
- LangSmithCan evaluate synthetic fixtures, misses, unsupported claims, cost and latency.
Learn the workflow